Intuitive Japanese Calligraphic Ideogram Intuitive Systems: Leadership for the 21st Century: online strategies and communications

The Business Blog at Intuitive.com

Dave Taylor
Dave Taylor has been involved with the online world since 1980 and is recognized globally as an expert on both technical and business issues. He has been published over a thousand times, launched four Internet-related startup companies, has written twenty business and technical books and holds both an MBA and MS Ed. He's a columnist for the Boulder Daily Camera and Linux Journal and frequently appears in other publications both online and in print. Additionally, Dave maintains four weblogs: The Business Blog at Intuitive.com, Ask Dave Taylor, Dave On Film, and GoFahterhood. Based in beautiful Boulder, Colorado, Dave is an award-winning speaker, sought after conference and workshop participant and frequent guest on radio and podcast programs, as well as active member of his community and busy single father to three children.

And I thought students had lots of opinions?

I'm mired in the middle of my weekly grading for the tech class I teach at University of Phoenix Online and I'm amazed that the easiest part of their grade is declining, week by week. Here's the deal: in a given seven day period, students are required to post in the main discussion group five of seven days, 2-3 postings per day. They should be at least a paragraph of new material and it's all on-topic for the class. It's also 20% of their grade.

So you'd think "gosh, that sounds like the easiest part of the grade: just natter on in the group and 1/5th of my grade is guaranteed?" but, surprisingly, students don't actually post very much.

I realize that students have lives and other things that take their time, but surely a one-paragraph posting even just once per day would take no more than 5-10 minutes total, right? That's 'waiting for your coffee to cool' time. But the grades tell the story...

Week one: 90%, 100%, 60%, 100%, 100%, 100%

Week two: 40%, 100%, 75%, 100%, 100%, 60%

Week three: 80%, 100%, 60%, 80%, 100%, 60%

A strange trend. And one that astonishes me because, of all people, I have always assumed that students have plenty to say...

Posted by Dave Taylor at May 20, 2003 11:18 AM

Comments

are you not pinging weblogs? That's why you're still at the bottom of my links it will only move up if you ping. It's all about the ping babee :)

Posted by: gnome-girl on May 20, 2003 8:33 PM

Kids DO have plenty to say. When they think the old geezers aren't looking . But a "school" setting is a whole other thing.

One of my kids did a lot of online ed (college courses long distance during high school), and his profs usually had class forums fairly highly structured. Kids didn't have to guess/wonder what kind of dialog the teacher wanted to stimulate. The prof would goose it along with examples and quips and they began to get the drift. He'd also give them a little applause for posts well done (kids love applause - don't we all?) and that would also get some rivalry going.

In short, it isn't a function of "build it and they will come." Especially not if they think they are being observed. You have to show them how to pitch before they go up to bat on their own.

Of course that is just my own observation and I could always be wrong ;->

Posted by: CaLady on June 1, 2003 10:42 PM

I couldn't agree more, but when you're teaching a course and each and every student has already had at least a dozen previous online courses, all of which have the same participation requirements, it's certainly curious, don't you think?

Posted by: Dave Taylor on June 1, 2003 10:44 PM

>> when you're teaching a course and each and every student has already had at least a dozen previous online courses, all of which have the same participation requirements, it's certainly curious, don't you think? ..

Well, three possibilities occur to me. You decide which is more likely ...

a) They don't know how to comment meaningfully on YOUR content, despite the prior experience or..

b) It's just performance anxiety relating to a new prof in a new class in a situation that will ease out once they get a better sense of you, or..

c) We're finally getting the first good rays of the season and a real tan is much nicer than the pallor you get from too much time in front of a CRT [only a half-joke ]

Posted by: CALady on June 2, 2003 3:29 AM

Hi Dave, if the trend over there is anything like the trend here in Germany, maybe you should find a link for SMS messages from Mobile Phones direct to your discussion forum!

;-)

Steve

Posted by: Steve on June 2, 2003 10:34 PM

I've taken 4 course with UoP (3 online, 1 ground, working on a BSIT after programming for 20 years) and I have some observations on the 'substantive discussion' requirement:

A lot of discussion depends upon the discussion seeds. Many of the seed questions I've seen were basically asking the students to parrot the official answer for a question, and then explain its relevance in their workplace. After seeing 10-15 students all try to regurgitate the lecture (and half of them with ungramatical English), trying to say something original becomes depressing. On the other hand, one of my instructors would post 4-5 questions each week, with a requirement to discuss half of them; this worked well for me because I could pick something that was meaningful/relevant to me, and actually discuss it in depth.

Another problem is the quality of responses. When I post 6 paragraphs discussing a topic, and someone responds with 'me too' or 'I disagree', it's a little hard to for me to make a substantive response. And of course, if I give a 6 paragraph response to a 6 word reply, I'm either 'talking down' to the other students (whatever that's supposed to mean) or I'm destroying their self-confidence by demonstrating my experience.

The largest problem, I think, is that most of these students aren't prepared to do college-level work, and the University is letting them float through classes and taking their money, instead of getting them into the appropriate prep courses first. I've seen too many people that can't read or write at college-level attempting to write papers on development methodologies when they don't even know how to congugate verbs or spell-check their papers.

Posted by: W. Craig Trader on June 4, 2003 5:27 PM

One significant problem you highlight, Craig, is that all colleges are facing the problem of insufficiently prepared incoming students. It's great to say that they need more prep time, but it's important to realize that it's a problem that must be faced in each class. To UP's credit, I am not aware of any backlash for giving lower grades...

Posted by: Dave Taylor on June 4, 2003 9:08 PM

Craig -- what exactly is congugating a verb, sir?

Dave -- perhaps you're not aware of a backlash because it just doesn't happen that often...

Anbody see that they just settled around 13 million dollars worth of issues with the feds. Craig hit it on the dot -- all 'bout the benjamins.

Yes, I went to skool their.

Posted by: J. R. on September 9, 2004 12:17 PM
Insider's Guide to Blogging
Before you leave a comment, a tip: If you're interested in blogging, you should sign up for my Blogsmart News so you can stay up to date on the latest insider tips and ideas for your Internet business and marketing efforts. Sign up right now and you'll get a free copy of my "Insider's Guide to Blogging" ebook too!
 
Post a comment




Because I value your thoughtful opinions, I encourage you to add a comment to this discussion. Don't be offended if I edit your comments for clarity or to keep out questionable matters, however, and I may even delete off-topic comments.



RDF XML GeoURL Add to My Yahoo!

Valid CSS!