Intuitive Japanese Calligraphic Ideogram Intuitive Systems: Leadership for the 21st Century: online strategies and communications

The Business Blog at Intuitive.com

Dave Taylor
Dave Taylor has been involved with the online world since 1980 and is recognized globally as an expert on both technical and business issues. He has been published over a thousand times, launched four Internet-related startup companies, has written twenty business and technical books and holds both an MBA and MS Ed. He's a columnist for the Boulder Daily Camera and Linux Journal and frequently appears in other publications both online and in print. Additionally, Dave maintains four weblogs: The Business Blog at Intuitive.com, Ask Dave Taylor, Dave On Film, and GoFatherhood. Based in beautiful Boulder, Colorado, Dave is an award-winning speaker, sought after conference and workshop participant and frequent guest on radio and podcast programs, as well as active member of his community and busy single father to three children.

Are guest blog entries "works for hire"?

I've been working on writer's guidelines for my Ask Dave Taylor blog and wanted to include some wording about my requirement that the rights to an article transfer to me when submitted. Why? Because I wanted to ensure that there'd never be any issues of our relationship going sour and them then insisting I pull the article and any references. Quite unlikely, but it's always good to cover your proverbial bases.

Here's the wording I was going to use:

Anything I get from you is considered a legal work for hire submission under prevailing US copyright law, which means that you give up ownership of the article, you don't retain copyright, and if we have a falling out down the road (which I, of course, hope doesn't happen) that the article remains my property and I can choose to leave it on the site. If you want to retain copyright, be able to publish it elsewhere, whatever, no worries, glad we hit this now: you won't be able to write for my site and I wish you terrific luck wherever you do end up publishing online. No hard feelings at all.
I twittered about it and got a comment back from Ben Oelsner, an intellectual property attorney with Kendall, Koenig & Oelsner PC telling me to be careful because work for hire is primarily intended only for employees, not contractors.

I asked him for more details, and here's what he generously explained:



If you are hiring non-employee contractors to create copyrightable content for you, or you are accepting content contributions from individuals who are not employed by you, and you want to own such content, it is a good idea to require that the content creator assign all of his or her rights in such content to you, in addition to or instead of relying on "work for hire" concepts. Under copyright law, the author of the work owns that work and has rights to which an author is entitled. If a work is considered a work made for hire, there will be an effect on the term of the copyright and the ability of the owner to terminate copyright rights.

Although the general rule is that the person who creates a work is the author of that work, there is an exception to this principle for works called "works made for hire." If a work is "made for hire," the employer, and not the employee, is considered the author.
Section 101(1) of the Copyright Act expressly defines a "work made for hire" as a work prepared by an employee within the scope of his or her employment, so, if an individual is considered employee under copyright law, the employer will be the "author" of the work and therefore, the employer will own all of the copyright rights in the work and be entitled to the rights of authors under copyright law.

If an individual who is not considered an employee under copyright law creates a copyrightable work, that individual will be considered the author of the work and, therefore, the owner of that work. However, if that individual is hired to create the work or content contributions created by that individual are accepted online, under Section 101(2) of the Copyright Act, there is an exception this author principle that can make a copyrightable work created by a non-employee a "work made for hire." A non-employee created work can only be a work made for hire if both of the following two conditions are met. First, there needs to be a written agreement signed by both parties that states that the parties expressly agree that the work shall be considered a work made for hire. Second, the work must specially commissioned for use within specified categories. These categories are described in Section 101(2) as follows: "a contribution to a collective work, as a part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, as a translation, as a supplementary work, as a compilation, as an instructional text, as a test, as answer material for a test, or as an atlas. For the purpose of the foregoing sentence, a "supplementary work" is a work prepared for a publication as a secondary adjunct to a work by another author for the purpose of introducing, concluding, illustrating, explaining, revising, commenting upon, or assisting in the use of the other work, such as forewords, afterwords, pictorial illustrations, maps, charts, tables, editorial notes, musical arrangements, answer material for tests, bibliographies, appendixes, and indexes; and an "instructional text" is a literary, pictorial, or graphic work prepared for publication and with the purpose of use in systematic instructional activities."

If you can't make a strong argument that the created content falls within the categories described above, that content should not be considered a work made for hire under copyright law. If it's not a work made for hire by law, you, the person that hired the individual to create the work, won't be the "author" of the work, and therefore, you won't own the work.

What should you do to make sure you own the work? For any non-employee created work, you should have the author agree to assign all of his or her rights in the work created to you. You won't be the "author" for copyright purposes, but you will own all of the copyright rights in the work. A typical assignment provision may look like this:
You agree that all content that you provide to me will be my sole and exclusive property. You hereby irrevocably and unconditionally assigns to me all right, title, and interest worldwide in and to such content and all intellectual property rights to such content.
There are other terms that should be included in any copyright assignment, so you should contact your attorney for assistance in drafting any such agreement.

You will often see a "work made for hire" provision included in agreements with non-employee contractors. It should not be used in place of an assignment provision, but it can be used in addition to an assignment provision as a "belt and suspenders" option. However, if the contractor is an individual, it is possible that characterizing content as a work made for hire could have adverse consequences for you because it is possible that the contractor may be characterized as an employee for purposes of unemployment insurance and workers' compensation obligations (as a result of the relationship being treated as an employer-employee relationship). You and your attorney should analyze and determine the risk of including work made for hire language in any contract that you have with an individual.

See Circular 9 [PDF] on the Copyright Office web site for more information.



The key thing that jumped out at me when I got this explanation from Ben was this line: the contractor may be characterized as an employee for purposes of unemployment insurance and workers' compensation obligations. That would be a very bad unintended consequence!

So instead I've been working on creating a content submission agreement that's focused on granting a license that offers the protections I seek. When I've nailed down the wording, I'll add it to this blog posting, but in the meantime, if you're considering hiring people to write for your blog or other site and have been categorizing them as works for hire, this should give you pause.

And thanks again to Ben Oelsner of Kendall, Koenig & Oelsner PC for his invaluable insight into this nuanced situation.

Posted by Dave Taylor at March 22, 2010 11:47 AM

Comments

Good concepts to think about. I'm not a IP lawyer but I would just insert something that says "all rights to the work transfer to me" or don't worry about it. What is the chance that a guest poster is going to want to pull an article that they benefit from? Seriously.

Posted by: JadeDragon@innovativepassiveincome on March 30, 2010 12:33 AM

Thanks for this article. It gives me clarification on my thesis works. I wonder before why does our university prohibit us to move our project out of our school for exposition. Our Dean told us that our project will be a school property for two years since the said project was made and guided in our school.

I'm no longer mad in our Dean now. thanks for the article!

Posted by: Rikvin Singapore on August 30, 2010 11:22 AM

Thanks for writing this article, VERY useful! I'd love an update, if you have it, on drafting a content submission agreement.

Posted by: Max on March 1, 2011 5:41 PM

Thanks for sharing this post with us. It's really a useful post that'll help me with my own blogging efforts.

Posted by: Bill Langersmith on March 18, 2013 9:22 AM
Insider's Guide to Blogging
Before you leave a comment, a tip: If you're interested in blogging, you should sign up for my Blogsmart News so you can stay up to date on the latest insider tips and ideas for your Internet business and marketing efforts. Sign up right now and you'll get a free copy of my "Insider's Guide to Blogging" ebook too!
 
Post a comment




Because I value your thoughtful opinions, I encourage you to add a comment to this discussion. Don't be offended if I edit your comments for clarity or to keep out questionable matters, however, and I may even delete off-topic comments.



RDF XML GeoURL Add to My Yahoo!

Valid CSS!