Intuitive Japanese Calligraphic Ideogram Intuitive Systems: Leadership for the 21st Century: online strategies and communications

The Business Blog at Intuitive.com

Dave Taylor
Dave Taylor has been involved with the Internet since 1980 and is widely recognized as an expert on both technical and business issues. He has been published over a thousand times, launched four Internet-related startup companies, has written twenty business and technical books and holds both an MBA and MS Ed. Dave maintains three weblogs, The Business Blog at Intuitive.com, focused on business and industry analysis, the eponymous Ask Dave Taylor devoted to tech and business Q&A and The Attachment Parenting Blog, discussing topics of interest to parents. Dave is an award-winning speaker, sought after conference and workshop participant and frequent guest on radio and podcast programs.

Google Maps smacked down by the Pentagon

I read this headline in the Wall Street Journal and said "well, duh, yeah."

Pentagon Bans Google Earth from Mapping Military Bases.

The article explains that "A message sent to all Defense Department bases and installations around the country late last week told officials to not allow the popular mapping Web site from taking panoramic views inside the facilities."

Michael Kucharek, spokesman for U.S. Northern Command, said: "the decision was made after crews were allowed access to at least one base. He said military officials were concerned that allowing the 360-degree, street-level video could provide sensitive information to potential adversaries and endanger base personnel."

I can only be aghast at the poor judgment of military police who let any Google Map (or MSN Earth, etc etc) teams drive onto a military base and take detailed panoramic photographs of the facility and its exact layout.

In my opinion, it's worrying enough that you can pick any random military base and find a nice aerial photograph of it. For example, here's Andrews Air Force Base, quite close up:

Andrews Air Force Base: Satellite View

Now this image unto itself isn't necessarily going to help a terrorist plan an attack, but the level of detail is rather extraordinary and if you look for a larger military establishment like Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base it's certainly foreseeable how good on-ground intel could aid a foreign national far more than a Marine who seeks to figure out where "building 1101" is actually located on base.

I think that the challenge of finding a balance between vigilance and openness is a tricky one, and the ever-wider availability of geo-data makes it a particularly tricky issue. But it's not just limited to Google Maps and military establishments either: services like Yahoo's new Fire Eagle make it easier for someone to track your location (assuming you sign up for the geolocation service, still in early beta). Is that a good thing?

How do we balance privacy, security, pragmatic vigilance, optimism and openness in the twenty-first century?

Posted by Dave Taylor at March 6, 2008 2:13 PM

Comments

Seems everyone but Google thinks this is a no-brainer. No shock there.

As for "getting on base", the base that they allegedly accessed may not be a sensitive base (yes there are some), or they just flat out lied (I wouldn't put that past googlenauts).

Wonder if Google will have the sense to go along with this, or will they play the "free the Internet" b.s.?

Posted by: Mark on March 6, 2008 3:53 PM
Insider's Guide to Blogging
Before you leave a comment, a tip: If you're interested in blogging, you should sign up for my Blogsmart News so you can stay up to date on the latest insider tips and ideas for your Internet business and marketing efforts. Sign up right now and you'll get a free copy of my "Insider's Guide to Blogging" ebook too!
 
Post a comment




Because I value your thoughtful opinions, I encourage you to add a comment to this discussion. Don't be offended if I edit your comments for clarity or to keep out questionable matters, however, and I may even delete off-topic comments.



RDF XML GeoURL Add to My Yahoo!

Valid CSS!