Dave Taylor has been involved with the online world since 1980 and
is recognized globally as an expert on both technical and business
issues. He has been published over a thousand times, launched four Internet-related
startup companies, has written twenty business and technical books and holds both an MBA and MS Ed.
He's a columnist for the Boulder Daily Camera and
Linux Journal and frequently appears
in other publications both online and in print.
Additionally, Dave maintains four weblogs:
The Business Blog at Intuitive.com,
Ask Dave Taylor,
Dave On Film,
Based in beautiful Boulder, Colorado, Dave is an award-winning speaker, sought after conference and workshop participant and
frequent guest on radio and podcast programs, as well as active member of
his community and busy single father to three children.
Of lazy journalists and wanton plagiarism
As a teacher, I have spent a lot of time reading up on, thinking about, and debating plagiarism. Where is the line between being inspired by someone else's work and the theft of intellectual property? It's not always so easy to figure out.
On the other hand, as my friend and colleague Randy Cassingham can attest, sometimes plagiarism is so glaring that it's almost embarassing for the other party. And if it's a national news publication that's stealing content, well, the best I can say is that it's just another mark against the so-called journalism professional.
Here's the story...
Randy writes the hilarious This Is True, a nationally syndicated newspaper column that's also available via email (which is how I've subscribed for years). If you're familiar with News of the Weird, then you'll appreciate that This is True is really NotW done right, at least in my opinion.
"Today, [Craig] Silverman [of Regret the Error] carries an unusually lengthy report on a very old item that came back into circulation and ended up as "news" report in at least three widely scattered newspapers. "
Plagiarism? You bet. You should go and read the original article from Silverman and you'll see that it's unconscionable - and embarassing - that major publications like the Toronto Star have been caught stealing content without paying its original source.
In an era where citizen journalists are fighting with professional journalists for the right to say that they're the future of information reporting and analysis, every time a journalist trips up, I can't help but question the very premise of the debate, that professional journalists are the professionals, who fact check, use duplicate sources, have editors, and, of course, always cite their sources. Or do they?
I asked Randy for his perspective on this situation too, since he's quite plugged in to the online world, and here's what he said:
"This is basic journalism school stuff -- full-time reporters backed by professional editors should be able to recite the rules in their sleep. It's fundamental to the job: you don't take facts without attribution, and you don't plagiarize -- period!
"I was fairly shocked when I saw it. First, that they would run with an item they found on the Internet without getting corroboration. Second, that they would take an item from a syndicated columnist and publish it without permission or attribution. And third, that they
would take my commentary on the item and use it as their own, as if they had written it. The first is foolish; the second is ethically shaky; the third is plain plagiarism -- there's no nicer word for it.
"Is it serious? Let's see: they didn't just lift facts, which is allowable (but maybe unethical, if they don't give attribution), but they used someone else's words and ideas and sold them as their own. That's not just unprofessional, it's highly unethical, and it could be argued that it's literally illegal according to copyright law. Even if it wasn't illegal, I don't think anyone would argue that doing something that's unprofessional and unethical is anything but quite serious.
"What's shocking is that newspapers are really up against the wall these days when it comes to ethics. Newspapers are losing more and more readers, and this is a good example why: if people can't trust what they read in newspapers, they'll go elsewhere. And they are. Newspapers simply can't afford to have lax ethics; they should be setting the standard, because as we have seen time and time again, including in this case, it's ridiculously easy to get caught."
I couldn't agree more, Randy. It'll be interesting to see how the Toronto Star deals with the situation.
Before you leave a comment, a tip: If you're interested in blogging, you should sign up for my Blogsmart News so you can stay up to date
on the latest insider tips and ideas for your Internet business and marketing
efforts. Sign up right now and you'll get a free copy
of my "Insider's Guide to Blogging" ebook too!